ChildCare Action Project (CAP): Christian Analysis of American Culture


Click on CAPCon Alert
image for explanation
Entertainment Media Analysis Report
A service to parents and grandparents

Rugrats in Paris: The Movie (2000), (G)
CAP Score: 84
CAP Influence Density: 0.29

NOT associated with Landover or Westboro Baptist in any way.
AD Space Available

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More
Now by MC, Amex, Visa and more!
Your donations are TAX DEDUCTIBLE!

The foul language eliminator

Removes profanity from
movies and TV shows

Switch to LifeLine

for Christian
long distance service

The Family Friendly

Internet Service

A Christ Centered
Christians Online
Community Web Site


From the best-seller book series.

NOW ONLY $24.95! Just in time for Christmas!


Christian Media News

A Singles
Christian Network

Your One Stop

For Everything Christian

Free Email Ministry

Subscribe Today!!

Visit this CBX member
Christian Banner eXchange

ALERT: To fully understand this report you should first visit the topics suggested by the CAP Table of Contents.

For FREE text-only versions of our media analysis reports as they are calculated, open this email then click "send." If your browser does not handle this URL format properly, send us a request to add you.

NOTE: The CAP Analysis Model makes no scoring allowances for trumped-up "messages" to excuse or for manufacturing of justification for aberrant behavior or imagery, or for camouflaging such ignominy with "redeeming" programming. Disguising sinful behavior in a theme or plot does not excuse the sinful behavior of either the one who is drawing pleasure from the sinful display or the practitioners demonstrating the sinful behavior. This is NOT a movie review service. It is a movie analysis service to parents and grandparents to tell them the truth about movies using the Truth. If you do not want the plot, ending, or "secrets" of a movie spoiled for you, skip the Summary/Commentary. In any case, be sure to visit the Findings/Scoring section -- it is purely objective and is the heart of the CAP Entertainment Media Analysis Model applied to this movie

"There are some in the entertainment industry who maintain that 1) violent programming is harmless because no studies exist that prove a connection between violent entertainment and aggressive behavior in children, and 2) young people know that television, movies, and video games are simply fantasy. Unfortunately, they are wrong on both accounts." [Emphasis is mine] And "Viewing violence may lead to real life violence." I aplaud these associations for fortifying 1 Cor. 15:33. Read the rest of the story. From our five-year study, I contend that other aberrant behaviors, attitudes, and expressions can be inserted in place of "violence" in that statement. Our Director - Child Psychology Support, a licensed psychologist and certified school psychologist concurs. For example, "Viewing arrogance against fair authority may lead to your kids defying you in real life." Or "Viewing sex may lead to sex in real life." Likewise and especially with impudence, hate and foul language. I further contend that any positive behavior can be inserted in place of "violence" with the same chance or likelihood of being a behavior template for the observer; of being incorporated into the behavior mechanics and/or coping skills of the observer. In choosing your entertainment, please consider carefully the "rest of the story" and our findings.

If Scriptural references appear, the full text appears at the end of the Summary / Commentary likely using a mix of KJV and NIV.


*RUGRATS IN PARIS: THE MOVIE* (G) -- "I want a mom who'll take my hand and make me feel like a holiday."

I have said several times that it is not the job of this ministry to decide for you whether a movie is fit for you and your family -- that is YOUR decision to make. We just give you the truth about a movie using the teachings and expectations of Jesus as our investigation standards so YOU can decide for yourselves whether a movie is or is not fit. And we give you some comparative numeric tools to help you make an informed decision. This report on something as seemingly innocuous as a G-rated Rugrats movie may put your trust in this service to the test. Please be patient with me while I thump on the Bible.

Let me get this part over with -- there was nudity in this cartoon for kids. A trio of restauranteurs dressed as Sumo wrestlers display themselves with lengthy camera-forced attention on the revealing aspects of their traditional garb. Of the screen time showing the Sumo characters, much more time was spent on their posterior or their raised legs from a lower-than-eye-level viewing angle than was spent on their faces. They even do a dance, flapping their flab in the breeze. Though display of a little more skin more often and with longer visual contact to a younger audience each year has gotten to the point of general approval does NOT free such display of its accountability to God's Word. Just because that style of "un"dress is a cultural feature of an entire population does not make display of nudity okay. Why would you suppose the Bible calls it "shameful nakedness?" Just because Homer Simpson(tm) gets away with it does not excuse it. Wide acceptance of such does not equal God's approval of it. If everyone who has ever drawn and will ever draw a breath committed theft, stealing would still be a sin. And to the adversaries of this ministry, we will not discuss a three-inch strap up the backside qualifying as "clothing."

I know I sound brutal on nudity in and as entertainment but consider Hab. 2:15 "Woe to him who gives drink to his neighbors, pouring it from the wineskin till they are drunk, so that he can gaze on their naked bodies." Has the entertainment industry's relentless barrage of nudity and tease of it in and as entertainment, pouring it from their cameras until every eye has seen it, made us, their "neighbors" so drunk (desensitized) to it that we can gaze upon it with impunity toward His Word about it? Are we now so drunk with it that we have lost all inhibition toward it? Do we no longer care that God calls gratuitous nakedness "shameful" ... repeatedly?

Now to the storyline...

Euroreptarland in Paris, a Japanese-owned amusement park, is experiencing some difficulties. The giant reptar, designed by Stu Pickles is going haywire and falling apart. Coco La Bouche, the curator of the park and next in line for company president, demands that Stu report to Euroreptarland to fix the contraption. By what may have been miscommunications, the entire Rugrats clan gets to go with Stu to Paris. As connective programming, the Japanese company owner would prefer that the new president be a family person. Coco is single. A rather bitter and conniving single woman at that. To fill the family person requirement she plans to marry widower Charles Finster and adopt his son Chuckie -- at any cost.

Once in Paris the shenanigans start. Mixed very well into Rube Goldberg antics was Chuckie missing his mommy and wanting a new mommy, saddened by the sight of all the other kids dancing with their mommies. A sample of the tearful and very warm emotions conveyed by this part of the movie is a song sung by Chuckie which included: "I want a mom who'll take my hand and make me feel like a holiday...who'll love me whatever." What a wonderful definition of "mom." The author is to be commended.

Many clever and ingenious strings of events wrap together like a pig-in-a-blankey to present what could have been much more delightful. There was material for child and parent alike, but as usual some unnecessary programming was added for what purpose only God, the filmmakers and the writers know. Angelica was a little extra snippy in this version. A flight attendant was anything but attendant. We are treated with two dogs sniffing each other, the curvature of Bouche's' glutei maximi, and a dog urinating on the Eiffel Tower. [Isa. 2:17] The extent of trickery and the teachings to break rules [2Tim. 2:5] might cause a little bend in the continuity of your teachings of wholesomeness and ethics [Hebr. 13:9]. There are a few more ignominies as itemized in the Findings/Scoring section which combine with these to mathematically yield a score of 84: three points below the lower limit of the 17-point G scoring range; two points under the top of the 18-point PG scoring range.


  • 1 Cor. 15:33 (KJV) Be not deceived: evil communications corrupt good manners. (NIV) Do not be misled: Bad company corrupts good character.
  • Isa. 2:17 The arrogance of man will be brought low and the pride of men humbled; the LORD alone will be exalted in that day,
  • 2Tim. 2:5 Similarly, if anyone competes as an athlete, he does not receive the victor's crown unless he competes according to the rules.
  • Hebr. 13:9 Do not be carried away by all kinds of strange teachings. It is good for our hearts to be strengthened by grace, not by ceremonial foods, which are of no value to those who eat them.


    As always, it is best to refer to the Findings/Scoring section -- the heart of the CAP analysis model -- for the most complete assessment possible of this movie.

    FINDINGS / SCORING: Rugrats in Paris: The Movie (2000) CAP Thermometers

    NOTE: Multiple occurrences of each item described below may be likely, definitely when plural.

    Wanton Violence/Crime (W):
  • a woman thrown out of a car
  • kidnapping of 6 kids
  • a great fall

    Impudence/Hate (I)(1):
  • constant hatefulness by Angelica
  • rudeness and abrasiveness to children by adults
  • trickery
  • dog urinating on the Eiffel Tower
  • teaching to break rules
  • two dogs sniffing each other as dogs do

    Sex/Homosexuality (S):
  • snug-fitting dress on adult (standing out, making it obvious)
  • cartoon adult nudity

    Drugs/Alcohol (D):
  • diner wine

    Offense to God (O)(2):
  • none noted

    Murder/Suicide (M)(3):
  • none noted

  • (1) As noted in CAP Special Report-001, "Investigation Area and Scoring Trend," of the six CAP Investigation Areas, Impudence/Hate was the strongest presence in all four movie classifications. It has a strong revelation about the entertainment media.

    (2) The use of the three/four letter word vocabulary without God's name in vain is incorporated into the Impudence/Hate Investigation Area. The use of God's name with or without the four letter expletive is incorporated into the Offense to God Investigation Area. There is no duplication.

    (3) Only portrayal of successful murder or suicide are incorporated into Murder/Suicide. Portrayal of attempts to commit murder or suicide and deaths by police action or war are incorporated into Wanton Violence/Crime.

    The ChildCare Action Project (CAP) is a nonprofit Christian ministry. We rely on public support. If you wish to contribute to the CAP, please send your donations to

    ChildCare Action Project
    Post Office Box 177
    Granbury, TX 76048-0177

    Your gifts are tax deductible in accordance with Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Service Tax Codes.

    Please feel free to write to us.

    You are welcome to
    Go back to the CAP Reports Page
    Top of the CAP Home Page
    CAP Table of Contents

    or leave me an email message or comment at

    Thank you for visiting us and may God bless you. Prayerfully, we will provide you with some of the most revealing commentary and investigative reporting you have ever read.

    In the name of Jesus:
    Lord, Master, Teacher, Savior, God.

    ChildCare Action Project: Christian Analysis of American Culture (CAP)

    Copyright ChildCare Action Project (CAP)