RED does not mean "stop." GREEN does not mean "go." Click on the CAPCon Alert image for explanation |
A ministry of the ChildCare Action Project: Christian Analysis of American Culture (CAP Ministry) A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit Christian Ministry. www.capalert.com/ Entertainment Media Analysis Report A service to His little ones through you in His name by His Word MAR2011.065 (1969), G [Ultra-lite 13-G*] (2hr 5.3min) The #1 Christian entertainment media analysis service on the Internet. We give you OBJECTIVE tools NO ONE ELSE CAN to help YOU make an informed decision for yourself whether a film is fit for your family. Over 1300 analyses for parents, grandparents, pastors, youth leaders and more. |
(a PayPal account is NOT required). The CAP is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit Christian ministry. Donations are TAX-DEDUCTIBLE. |
on what Hollywood feeds your kids. SUBSCRIBE (or unsubscribe) to our FREE email version of these reports and our COMING SOON notices. |
Christian Long Distance |
(While the Scriptural references are certainly not subjective, my commentary may be and sometimes is somewhat subjective.)
Cast/Crew Details Courtesy Internet Movie Database Production (US): Paramount Pictures Distribution (US): Paramount Home Video Director(s): Henry Hathaway Producer(s): Hal B. Wallis, Paul Nathan, Joseph Hazen Screenplay: Marguerite Roberts From the Novel by: Charles Portis Cinematography/Camera: Lucien Ballard Music: Elmer Bernstein Film Editing: Warren Low Production Design: Walter Tyler Viewed on Paramount Pictures Home Entertainment DVD Well, here it is as promised. A CAP analysis of the original True Grit (G) for comparative with the 2010 version. The rolling credits are still running and I have not yet crunched the numbers. That is next. (And this time maybe I'll remember to edit out the html formatting characters and URLs out of this email version before sending it to you.) I felt apprehensive while watching this original True Grit because minute by minute I noticed it contained almost all of the content of the 2010 version, including foul language. The only saving grace this original might have is that the content in this original is not as graphic, bold and dark as much of the content in the 2010 version. Let the numbers tell. To start, following is the ratings screen in the trailer for the 1969 version: "The Motion Picture Code and Rating Administration has rated this motion picture M Suggested for Mature Audiences. Parental Discretion Advised." with the MPAA logo beneath it all. But the DVD case reads G with the MPAA logo next to it. M equates to today's R. What gives!? More information to follow. This original G-rated version of True Grit earned a final score of 67 which places it at the very top of the scoring range for movies rated PG-13 (55 to 67 out of 100) in the comparative baseline database. The original True Grit was edited for a re-rating up from M. How an R-caliber movie could be edited up to a G and still be that movie is beyond me. I stand with the CAP analysis final score. The original True Grit is an ultra-lite 13-G*, meaning a film rated G earning a PG-13 equivalent score. The original True Gritwas definitely not edited enough to be a G. The 14 uses of profanity in the original version are still profanity today. Fourteen uses of profanity!? That doesn't make any sense. No G movie I've ever seen has had 14 uses of profanity in it. Something is terribly wrong here! And it ain't the CAP analysis model. The remake of 2010 followed the original story fairly well. Like in the 2010 version adolescent Mattie Ross (Kim Darby) is out to find and kill Tom Chaney (Jeff Corey), the murderer of her father, Frank Ross (John Pickard). Realizing she was not of the caliber necessary to trek the wilderness after a murderous criminal, Mattie hires US Marshall Reuben J. "Rooster" Cogburn (John Wayne) to take her to find and kill Chaney who has fled to the Indian Nation. Coming along is Texas Ranger LaBoeuf (Glen Campbell) who has been after Chaney for the better part of four months for killing a Senator over an argument about the senator's dog. For the most part just the faces have changed. Some of the story is different if only because this 1969 version is 21 minutes longer. Much of that 21 minutes is spent doing a better job building the story and the characters than in the 2010 version. In our analysis of the 2010 version I threatened to make a subjective determination on which actors/actresses did a better job. Though I am not qualified to say, Jeff Bridges was better at portraying the crusty old drunk Rooster Cogburn than John Wayne. So was Hailee Steinfield better at playing the mouthy, exasperating adolescent Mattie Ross. And likewise Matt Damon was better at playing the Texas Ranger than Glen Campbell. I had heard the Golden Globe and Academy Award for best actor won by Wayne for his performance in True Grit were gifts just because during all of his long movie career he had not won any awards. I have to agree the awards were gifts. But then, I am not a professional film critic. Following is the data comparative of the scoring of the two versions of True Grit: The detail provided by the above graphic should be enough that not much discussion is needed. The comparative shows there is more violence (W) and Offense to God (O) content but less profanity (I) in the 2010 version than in the 1969 version but everything else is fairly close to the same. Kim Darby got a spanking in the original version as did Hailee Steinfield did in the 2010 version but Campbell did it with a switch in the 1969 version where Damon did much of it with his hand in the 2010 version (this is the reason for the difference in the Sexual Immorality scores). A comment might be that with the above visual comparative you can see there is not much difference in the content between the two versions. There are "fine tuning" differences in individual investigation area scores such as discussed above but the "big picture" of the comparative - the final scores 67 & 59 - shows relatively little difference in the moral content. The final score bars are close. Recall that PG-13 films in the comparative baseline database earned final scores of 55 to 67 out of 100. With a final score of 67 the original version is at the very top of the PG-13 equivalent scoring range, making this film an ultra-lite 13-G*. By the way, I noticed one "blooper" in this 1969 version. On the wall of the federal courtroom was a US flag with 48 stars. In 1880 there were only 38 states (plus 9 territories). Note that while the year of the period was apparently not mentioned in the story it was seen on the gravestone of Frank Ross. Wanton Violence/Crime (W) - 28 out of 100 An example of the lessened severity of the violence content of this 1969 version is that Mattie did not have to cut down a hung dead man as she did in the 2010 version. The killing of one of the bad guys by Cogburn was not done by a gun blast to the face and then showing his decimated face afterwards. In the 1969 version Cogburn simply shot him. Also in that scene, one of the characters had his fingers amputated by a knife attack but in the 1969 version they were simply cut. These are examples of the less graphic nature of the 1969 version. But still, violence is violence whether in 1969 or in 2010. So, the same admonition of our Lord applies as well: that God warns us that violence is "catching." [Prov. 16:29] And man's plagiarizing of God's word applies as well: that "viewing violence may lead to real life violence." Impudence/Hate (I) - 52 out of 100 In the 2010 version there were seven uses of profanity. There were 14 in this 1969 version. [Col. 3:8, 2 Tim. 2:16, Prov. 4:24] As were in the 2010 version, lies were tossed about occasionally. But not found in the 2010 version that is present in this 1969 version was Mattie showing deceit toward her mother with "I won't tell momma." Sexual Immorality (S) - 100 out of 100 There was nothing found that could even remotely be construed as sexually immoral in the entire 125.3 minutes of programming. No one fondled anyone. No man was found in bed with a woman. No man tried to have his way with Mattie. Etcetera. Drugs/Alcohol (D) - 49 out of 100 Cogburn is a drunk. So drinking and drunkenness are to be expected. Just about as much as was in the 2010 version. The same admonitions apply to viewing drinking and drunkenness (and smoking) as entertainment found in any other film apply to this film as well. A 2002 study by the American College of Physicians (ACP) revealed that adolescent exposure to drinking in and as entertainment undeniably leads to abuse of alcohol among underage viewers. The finding entitled Relation Between Parental Restrictions on Movies and Adolescent Use of Tobacco and Alcohol reports that of 4544 youths from grades 5 through 8 of fifteen Vermont and New Hampshire middle schools (90% of the youths were under fourteen years old) only 16% were completely restricted in their entertainment diets. Within the ACP study population, the prevalence of having tried alcohol without parental knowledge was Offense to God (O) - 89 out of 100 Though God's Word was praised in a hymn in the film, His name was abused four times. [Deut. 5:11] Murder/Suicide (M) - 84 out of 100 While there were many killings that were done as police action or defensive killing, there were three murders: one by gunfire; one by stabbing; one by hit in the head with a rock. SCRIPTURAL APPLICATION(S) If needed to focus or fortify, applicable text is underlined or bracketed [ ] or bold. If you wish to have full context available, the Blue Letter Bible is a convenient source. If you use the Blue Letter Bible, a new window will open. Close it to return here or use "Window" in your browser's menu bar to alternate between the CAP page and the Blue Letter Bible page. CHAPTER/VERSE ***Selected Scriptures of Armour against the influence of the entertainment industry*** As always, it is best to refer to the Findings/Scoring section -- the heart of the CAP analysis model -- for the most complete assessment possible of this movie. |
(The objective heart of the CAP Analysis Model, independent of and insulated from the Summary / Commentary section.) Wanton Violence/Crime (W) - 28 out of 100 Impudence/Hate (I) - 52 out of 100 Sexual Immorality (S) - 100 out of 100 Drugs/Alcohol (D) - 49 out of 100 Offense to God (O) - 89 out of 100 Murder/Suicide (M) - 84 out of 100 |
There are some in the entertainment industry who maintain that 1) violent programming is harmless because no studies exist that prove a connection between violent entertainment and aggressive behavior in children, and 2) young people know that television, movies, and video games are simply fantasy. Unfortunately, they are wrong on both accounts." And "Viewing violence may lead to real life violence." I applaud these associations for fortifying 1 Cor. 15:33. Read the rest of the story. From our years of study, I contend that other aberrant behaviors, attitudes, and expressions can be inserted in place of "violence" in that statement. Our Director - Child Psychology Support, a licensed psychologist and certified school psychologist concurs. For example, "Viewing arrogance against fair authority may lead to your kids defying you in real life." Or "Viewing sex may lead to sex in real life." Likewise and especially with impudence, hate and foul language. I further contend that any positive behavior can be inserted in place of "violence" with the same chance or likelihood of being a behavior template for the observer; of being incorporated into the behavior mechanics and/or coping skills of the observer. In choosing your entertainment, please consider carefully the "rest of the story" and our findings. |
Thank you for visiting us and may God bless you. Prayerfully, we will provide you with some of the most revealing commentary and investigative reporting you have ever read. In the name of Jesus: Lord, Master, Teacher, Savior, God. Tom Carder Chaplain and President ChildCare Action Project (CAP): Christian Analysis of American Culture 100% dependent on your tax-deductible financial support |
Christian Long Distance |
|
We exist only by your tax-deductible donations. PLEASE Features PayPal! You do NOT need an account to donate. |
For G rated Films with G equivalence: G PG equivalence: PG-G PG-13 equivalence: 13-G R equivalence: R-G< | For PG rated Films with G equivalence: G-PG PG equivalence: PG PG-13 equivalence: 13-PG R equivalence: R-PG | For PG-13 rated Films with G equivalence: G-13 PG equivalence: PG(13) PG-13 equivalence: PG-13 R equivalence: R-13 | For R rated Films with G equivalence: G-R PG equivalence: PG-R PG-13 equivalence: 13-R R equivalence: R | For NR rated Films with G equivalence: G-NR PG equivalence: PG-NR PG-13 equivalence: 13-NR R equivalence: R-NR |