Click on CAPCon Alert image for explanation
Christian Analysis of American Culture (CAP Ministry)
Entertainment Media Analysis Report
A service to His little ones (which includes at-home teens) through you, their parents and grandparents, in His name by His Word
Give your visitors access to more than 800 CAP movie analyses while your page stays open. Put the link above on your web page. FREE! Test it! Click it!
Make your tax-deductible donations to the CAP Ministry through
Click here to see
UPDATED December 31, 2003
|US MAIL in US Dollars to
PO Box 177
Granbury, TX 76048-0177
Preferred. NO Service Charges.
|If either of the above two links have not worked properly for you, please try again. THANK YOU!!!|
To subscribe to or unsubscribe from our FREE text-only versions of our Entertainment Media Analysis Reports as they are calculated, visit our Mailman. If you experience difficulty with Mailman, send us your request. Your email address will NOT be given or sold to other parties.
|ALERT: To fully understand this report you should first visit the topics suggested by the CAP Site Map (Table of Contents). Further, if you do not want the plot, ending, or "secrets" of a movie spoiled for you, skip the Summary/Commentary. In any case, be sure to visit the Findings/Scoring section -- it is completely objective to His Word and is the heart of the CAP Entertainment Media Analysis Model applied to this movie.|
(2003), PG-13 -- ... a story of geriatric immorality.
Cast/Crew Details Courtesy Internet Movie Database
Production (US): Columbia Pictures Corporation, Waverly Films
Distribution (US): Sony Pictures Entertainment
Director(s): Nancy Meyers
Producer(s): Bruce A. Block, Suzanne McNeill Farwell, Nancy Meyers
Written by: Nancy Meyers
Cinematography/Camera: Michael Ballhaus
Music: Original - Blake Neely, Hans Zimmer. Non-original - Ary Barroso, Henri Betti, Cliff Burwell, George Gershwin, Chrissie Hynde, Louiguy, Charles Trenet, Marcos Valle, Harry Warren
Film Editing: Joe Hutshing
Casting: Janet Hirshenson, Jane Jenkins
Production Design: Jon Hutman
Art Direction: Steve Graham, John Warnke
Viewed At: Driftwood Theater 6
I guess the most foul of the foul words and God's name in vain with the four letter expletive are no longer reasons for declaring an R rating. The MPAA must think like a lot of teenagers who have told me things like "What's the difference? They're just words and we've heard them all before!" To that, let me say the first time of a sin does not excuse the second. Nor does the second time excuse the third -- or the thousandth. Nor does the thousandth excuse the first. While it is not a sin for Johnny to hear Jimmy say a foul word, it is sinful for Jimmy to say it and to influence Johnny with it. And it is sinful for Johnny (and Jimmy) if Johnny starts using it because of Jimmy ... or because of the movies [Luke 17:2]. Because of this copycat influential relationship and because of the massive influence of the entertainment industry, it is our position that the only exofamilial influence that more deeply and intimately saturates our youth than the entertainment industry is air. [Matt. 18:10]
Of the 30 uses of foul language and God's name in vain, 7 were of the three/four letter word variety [Prov. 22:11], two were the most foul of the foul words [Col. 3:8] and 31 were of God's name in vain, once with the four letter expletive [Deut. 5:11]. And with full female frontal nudity repeatedly, off screen intercourse, multiple rear male nudity, nude in-bed antics and long discourse about approval of immoral sex, how the MPAA can justify this film as fit for your 13 year old kids (or anyone for that matter) is beyond me. [1Ths. 4:1-5; Rev. 22:15] I hope Something's Gotta Give is "beyond" you and your kids, but that is your call to make. We just give you the details about the content of films plus some application of Scripture to noted behaviors/imagery so you can make an informed decision whether a film is or is not fit for your family.
Only a score of 100 in each of the Wanton Violence/Crime (W) and Murder/Suicide (M) investigation areas saved this "cess-xual" film from the "R-13" realm. Loss of only two more points in any of the six CAP investigation areas would have dumped this flick into the growing R-13 cancer. I guess the MPAA are now the ones who decide for you what is and is not fit for your kids, huh? Well? The current movie rating system is just another theft of another piece of your parental authority, mom/dad. What are you gonna do about it? (Aren't you getting a little tired of it? That is what we are trying to help you with.) maybe one day the CAP analysis model will replace the MPAA. Now there's a thought! You would then have full control of your family's entertainment diet again!
In a tale so suggestive of "Jack and Diane" by John Cougar Melencamp, Jack Nicholson and Diane Keaton team up with Keanu Reeves (what's he doing here?), Frances McDormand and Amanda Peet to bring us a story of geriatric immorality, all justified as comedy of course.
Nicholson plays the part of 63 year old Harry Sanborn, a record company owner bachelor from Manhattan who avoids romancing any woman over 30. Sanborn's current sights are set on Marin Barry (Amanda Peet), daughter of the famous recently retired and divorced after 20 years of marriage, Erica Barry (Diane Keaton). As Sanborn and Marin team up to shack up at her mother's house for the weekend mom shows up with aunt Zoe (Frances McDormand), feminist Columbia University professor. Well, now. What to do? Marin is an adult with a mind of her own and mom is the one who is uninvited in her own home which the pesky pair who do not own it decided to use as their shack up shack. So what's a progressive and enlightened mother with a feminist sister to do but approve? How can mom say "No?" Her daughter is all "growed up" and mom wasn't supposed to be in her house for the weekend!
Sanborn has a mild coronary while dancing and Dr. Julian Mercer (Keanu Reeves) decides Sanborn must not travel during his recovery -- Manhattan can wait. So, Sanborn is now confined to Erica's house. How serendipitous it is that Dr. Mercer is an obsessed fan of Erica's. Now he has the perfect opportunity to begin a romance with her. Now Mercer has an excuse to see Erica' at his convenience. And Sanborn now has an excuse to see Marin at his convenience, too.
That is a nutshell of the start of the movie. And it gets morally worse. It is indeed a modern comedy but that is the problem. I am sorry I cannot tell you more but I have to shorten these Summary/Commentary sections to save costs. Not to worry. the Findings/Scoring sections - the heart of the CAP analysis model - are not shortened or compromised in any way. So, please inspect the listing in the Findings/Scoring section in detail before you decide whether to let your teens (and yourselves) see Something's Gotta Give.
If needed to focus or fortify, applicable text is underlined or bracketed [ ]. If you wish to have full context available, the Blue Letter Bible is a convenient source. If you use the Blue Letter Bible, a new window will open. Close it to return here or use "Window" in your browser's menu bar to alternate between the CAP page and the Blue Letter Bible page.
***Selected Scriptures of Armour against the influence of the entertainment industry***
As always, it is best to refer to the Findings/Scoring section -- the heart of the CAP analysis model -- for the most complete assessment possible of this movie.
Wanton Violence/Crime (W)
Sexual Immorality (S)
Offense to God (O)
Single Christian Network
Kids, Teens and Home Vertical Portal
|There are some in the entertainment industry who maintain that 1) violent programming is harmless because no studies exist that prove a connection between violent entertainment and aggressive behavior in children, and 2) young people know that television, movies, and video games are simply fantasy. Unfortunately, they are wrong on both accounts." And "Viewing violence may lead to real life violence." I applaud these associations for fortifying 1 Cor. 15:33. Read the rest of the story. From our more than eight years of study, I contend that other aberrant behaviors, attitudes, and expressions can be inserted in place of "violence" in that statement. Our Director - Child Psychology Support, a licensed psychologist and certified school psychologist concurs. For example, "Viewing arrogance against fair authority may lead to your kids defying you in real life." Or "Viewing sex may lead to sex in real life." Likewise and especially with impudence, hate and foul language. I further contend that any positive behavior can be inserted in place of "violence" with the same chance or likelihood of being a behavior template for the observer; of being incorporated into the behavior mechanics and/or coping skills of the observer. In choosing your entertainment, please consider carefully the "rest of the story" and our findings.|