Click on CAPCon Alert image for explanation |
A service to His little ones (which includes at-home teens) through you, their parents and grandparents, in His name by His Word MAR23013 (2003), PG-13 Analysis Date: February 8, 2003 CAP Score: 35 CAP Influence Density: 1.46 MinMax: -81 |
Give your visitors clear access to ALL CAP movie analyses. Put the link above on your web page. FREE! |
NO service charges. All donations are tax deductible. |
To subscribe to (or unsubscribe from) our FREE text-only versions of our Entertainment Media Analysis Reports as they are calculated, visit our Mailman. If you experience difficulty with Mailman, send us your request. Your email address will NOT be given or sold to other parties. |
Cast/Crew Details Courtesy imdb.com Production: All Knight Productions LLC, Jackie Chan Films Limited, Spyglass Entertainment, Touchstone Pictures Distribution: Buena Vista Pictures, Touchstone Pictures Director(s): David Dobkin Producer(s): Stephanie Austin, Gary Barber, Roger Birnbaum, Jackie Chan, Willie Chan, Jonathan Glickman, Edward McDonnell, David Minkowski, Solon So, Matthew Stillman Written by/Screenplay: Alfred Gough & Miles Millar (written by and characters) Cinematography/Camera: Adrian Biddle, Harvey Harrison Music: Randy Edelman Film Editing: Malcolm Campbell Casting: Priscilla John, Donna Morong, Marcia Ross Production Design: Allan Cameron Art Direction: Giles Masters Viewed At: Driftwood Theater 6, Granbury, TX Chon Wang (Jackie Chan), pronounced "John Wayne", is sheriff of Carson City, Nevada in 1887. Born the son of Kim Chan, a keeper of the extremely valuable and important imperial seal in Forbidden City, China, Chon Wang decided to come to America though against his father, Kim Chan's wishes, so much so Kim Chan disowned Chon Wang for it. A dastardly dude named Rathbone (Aidan Gillen) murdered Kim Chan to get the imperial seal [Mark 7:18 - 23]. It was apparently the largest diamond in the world. The seal would be used by Rathbone as payment to Wu Yip (Donnie Yen) [Hab. 2:9] to kill the reigning Queen Victoria (Gemma Jones) plus nine other high ranking English officials who are each in line for the throne, leaving the power-mad Rathbone the only successor to the throne [Eph. 5:5]. Learning of his father's murder, Wang dispatches himself immediately to London, England to meet his sister, Chon Lin (Fann Wong) who traveled there on the trail of Rathbone. But Chon Wang was without adequate funds to make the trip to London. Remembering some gold owed him from some caper performed by he and and a previous associate, Roy O'Bannon (Owen Wilson), Chon Wang made a stop at New York to collect his due. Turns out, O'Bannon had long ago squandered the loot and was working as a waiter. With Wang's spirits undampened, the two decide to unite and "mail" themselves in a crate to England. Though there is some fun in Shanghai Knights such as creative Kung Fu fighting with umbrellas to the tune of "Singing in the Rain", there is some programming that is not so fun. Aside from a few instances of good comedy, about the best feature is how to spell Shanghai. When Rathbone kills Kim Chan, they are standing face to face and Rathbone lunges at Kim Chan while Kim Chan slumps in pain as life oozes from him. The viewer can see Rathbone's arm thrust forward. And Rathbone has such a realistic expression of great satisfaction on his face. What a message for our 13 year olds! Some of whom are learning to kill as an expression of gratification for being tormented [Matt. 24:12]. What better teacher can they have than such as this in and as entertainment. And yes, such onscreen behavior is a teacher. Even supposedly minor behavioral aberrations in and as entertainment such as mischief is contagious. Such exposure emboldens the impressionable, the younger the more impressionable, to go ahead and do 'it', "just like in the movies." "No matter what they do to me!" Movies of old certainly had killing in them but never with such arrogance and evil coldness as movies today. Never with such lure to the developing attitude and character. More killings include death hanging, death by arrows and death by decapitation after being shot with arrows. Four guards to Kim Chan's palace are murdered by Rathbone and his henchmen. The viewer sees the hanging victims with a rope around their necks being drawn up into the air. The viewer sees the arrows hit and impale the victims. While the viewer sees only the swinging of the sword in the decapitation, little is left to the imagination. All within three or four minutes. then, in thee or four more minutes, after much defensive fighting with swords, Kim Chan is murdered. that is five murders. There are more. And there is "intercourse" in this movie. Chon Wang is lying face up with a prostitute on top of him facing him with the camera angle from the top of their heads. He is dressed. She is somewhat dressed. She going up and down, up and down ... as exercise. That it was exercise was really what the filmmakers were trying to say. Sure, it was! [Mark 7:18 - 23] If you buy that I have a bridge I'll sell you. The gate to it is golden. And if you are not into bridges, I can get you some recreational/retirement real estate in Florida. Cheap. :o) Though I jest I suspect the point is made. At least to those with enough experiential maturity to understand satire and sarcasm. And, as is typical of PG-13, foul language was a serious issue of the programming including God's name in vain with and without the four letter expletive. [Col. 3:8] Please take the time to read the listing in the Findings/Scoring section before you decide whether to view this film with your kids. SCRIPTURAL APPLICATION(S) If needed to focus or fortify, applicable text is underlined or bracketed [ ]. If you wish to have full context available, the Blue Letter Bible is a convenient source. If you use the Blue Letter Bible, a new window will open. Close it to return here or use "Window" in your browser's menu bar to alternate between the CAP page and the Blue Letter Bible page. ***Selected Scriptures of Armour against the influence of the entertainment industry*** As always, it is best to refer to the Findings/Scoring section -- the heart of the CAP analysis model -- for the most complete assessment possible of this movie. |
Wanton Violence/Crime (W): Impudence/Hate (I)(1): Sex/Homosexuality (S): Drugs/Alcohol (D): Offense to God (O)(2): Murder/Suicide (M)(3): |
NO service charges!!! Donations to the CAP Ministry are Tax Deductible!!! |
Christian Media News |
A Singles Christian Network |
NOTE: While the Summary/Commentary section of these reports is precisely that -- a summary in commentary format which can be and sometimes is subjective, the actual CAP Analysis Model (the Findings/Scoring section) makes no scoring allowances for trumped-up "messages" to excuse, for manufacture of justification for, or camouflaging of ignominious content or aberrant behavior or imagery with "redeeming" programming. Disguising sinful behavior in a theme/plot does not excuse the sinful behavior of either the one who is drawing pleasure or example of behavior or thought from the sinful display or of the practitioners demonstrating the sinful behavior. We make no attempt to quantify the "artistic" or "entertainment" value of a movie -- whether a movie has any positive value or "entertainment" value is up to mom/dad. The CAP analysis model is the only known set of tools available to parents and grandparents which give *them* the control they need, bypassing the opinion-based assessment of movies by others and defeating the deceit of those who would say anything to convince their parents otherwise. The model is completely objective to His Word. Our investigation standards are founded in the teachings and expectations of Jesus Christ. If a sinful behavior is portrayed, it is called sinful whether Hollywood tries to make it otherwise. That the sinful behavior is "justified" by some manufactured conditions does not soften nor erase the price of sin. Whether there is application of fantasy "justification" or "redemption" is up to mom/dad. |
"There are some in the entertainment industry who maintain that 1) violent programming is harmless because no studies exist that prove a connection between violent entertainment and aggressive behavior in children, and 2) young people know that television, movies, and video games are simply fantasy. Unfortunately, they are wrong on both accounts." And "Viewing violence may lead to real life violence." I applaud these associations for fortifying 1 Cor. 15:33. Read the rest of the story. From our more than eight years of study, I contend that other aberrant behaviors, attitudes, and expressions can be inserted in place of "violence" in that statement. Our Director - Child Psychology Support, a licensed psychologist and certified school psychologist concurs. For example, "Viewing arrogance against fair authority may lead to your kids defying you in real life." Or "Viewing sex may lead to sex in real life." Likewise and especially with impudence, hate and foul language. I further contend that any positive behavior can be inserted in place of "violence" with the same chance or likelihood of being a behavior template for the observer; of being incorporated into the behavior mechanics and/or coping skills of the observer. In choosing your entertainment, please consider carefully the "rest of the story" and our findings. |