ChildCare Action Project (CAP): Christian Analysis of American Culture
http://www.capalert.com/

CAPCon ALERT


Click on CAPCon Alert
image for explanation
Entertainment Media Analysis Report
A service to our youth through you,
their parents and grandparents, in His name by His Word


MAR22130
Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (2002), PG-13
Analysis Date: December 17, 2002
CAP Score: 63
CAP Influence Density: 1.11

MinMax: -100

Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (2002) CAP Mini-thermometers




ALERT: To fully understand this report you should first visit the topics suggested by the CAP Site Map (Table of Contents).


NO service charges.
All donations are tax deductible.
SUBSCRIBE/UNSUBSCRIBE

To subscribe to (or unsubscribe from) our FREE text-only versions of our Entertainment Media Analysis Reports as they are calculated, visit our Mailman. If you experience difficulty with Mailman, send us your request. Your email address will NOT be given or sold to other parties.


NOTE: If you do not want the plot, ending, or "secrets" of a movie spoiled for you, skip the Summary/Commentary. In any case, be sure to visit the Findings/Scoring section -- it is completely objective to His Word and is the heart of the CAP Entertainment Media Analysis Model applied to this movie.






SUMMARY / COMMENTARY:


If Scriptural references appear, the full text appears at the end of the Summary / Commentary likely using a mix of KJV and NIV.


LORD OF THE RINGS: THE TWO TOWERS (PG-13) -- I invite any of our readers to prepare a guest commentary.

Production: New Line Cinema, The Saul Zaentz Company (licensor) (d/b/a Tolkien Enterprises), WingNut Films
Distribution: New Line Cinema, Warner Bros
Director(s): Peter Jackson
Producer(s): Peter Jackson, Michael Lynne, Mark Ordesky, Barrie M. Osborne, Rick Porras, Jamie Selkirk, Robert Shaye, Frances Walsh, Bob Weinstein, Harvey Weinstein
Written by/Screenplay: Novel: J.R.R. Tolkien. Screeplay: Frances Walsh, Philippa Boyens, Stephen Sinclair, Peter Jackson
Cinematography/Camera: Andrew Lesnie
Music: Howard Shore
Film Editing: D. Michael Horton
Casting: Victoria Burrows, John Hubbard, Amy MacLean, Liz Mullane, Ann Robinson
Production Design: Grant Major
Art Direction: Joe Bleakley, Dan Hennah, Philip Ivey, Rob Outterside, Mark Robins


Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers earned a CAP final score of 63, placing it squarely in the middle of the CAP comparative baseline database scoring range for PG-13 movies (55 to 67). Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring earned a final score of 59, making Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers fairly equivalent ... for the same two reasons: violence and offense to God. Very violent. Graphically. Even the Orcs were more evil-looking. And while the use of sorcery by the "good" to fight evil was not as thick in this installment, it was there. Gandalf is resurrected and appears in glowing white atop a huge stone as if to mimic our Lord when He transformed Himself on the Mount of Transformation before Peter, James and John after His Resurrection [Matt. 17:1 -2]. While there was no sexual programming whatsoever to Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring, Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers frequently presented a very scantily clad critter showing full side male nudity [**] and a woman was noted to be on top of a man kissing him.

Scenery was regal. Computer graphic artistry and detail were amazing. Attention to even the smallest of visible detail was remarkable. Even the attention-keeping features of the film were exemplary.

The results are in regarding our invitiation for our readers to prepare a guest commentary for Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers. Mr. Brian Day prepared the finest work which follows.

The Two Towers starts immediately where The Fellowship of the Ring ended, with a split up fellowship. Frodo (Elijah Wood), the bearer of the ring of evil power that has to be destroyed in the fires of Mount Doom, and Sam (Sean Astin) continue towards Mordor on the quest. The other two hobbits, Pippin (Billy Boyd) and Merry (Dominic Monaghan) are held captive by a force of the evil Uruk-Hai, who are taking them to their master. The remainder of the fellowship, the human Aragorn (Viggo Mortensen), the elf Legolas (Orlando Bloom), and the dwarf Gimli (John Rhys-Davies) are tracking and attempting to catch up with the Uruk-Hai to rescue Merry and Pippin.

The movie switches back and forth between these three groups to show what is occuring at each at a particular time. I'll summarize each story starting with the one that is given the least screen time, Merry and Pippin's.

The band of Uruk-Hai carrying Merry and Pippin are attacked by a group of cavalry from the nation of Rohan, through which the Uruk-Hai are traveling. In the ensuing fray Merry and Pippin escape into the nearby Fangorn forest. There they meet Treebeard (voiced by John Rhys-Davies). Treebeard is the eldest of a race of tree-like beings called the Ents.

Merry and Pippin try to convince Treebeard and the rest of the Ents to become involved in the war and fight for the good of Middle Earth against the strengthening dark forces (led by the Dark Lord Sauron and the corrupted wizard Saruman (Christopher Lee)). The Ents refuse, resulting in a very impassioned plea from one of the hobbits that the Ents are part of Middle Earth and should help to save it. There is a very strong element here of the old Edmund Burke quote, "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." Despite this plea, the Ents still decide to try to leave the war to the people who are already involved.

As Merry and Pippin are being carried out of the forest by Treebeard, they hit upon a way to bring the pain of the war home to the Ents. They ask Treebeard to take them toward Isengard, home of the wizard Saruman. When the Treebeard sees the destruction Saruman's forces have done to the forest in that area, he calls the rest of the Ents in for an attack on Isengard.

The 2nd storyline follows Frodo and Sam as they make their way toward Mordor and Mount Doom. Early on they capture the creature Gollum (a CG character over voice and body movements by Andy Serkis). Gollum was a previous carrier of the ring and has been twisted into an evil, pathetic creature by it. He has been following Frodo and Sam, hoping to kill them and take the ring back. Gollum is the most interesting character in the movie. Under his good treatment by Frodo, who feels some compassion and even kinship for the former ring-bearer, Gollum's "good-side" starts to emerge and war with the evil that has ruled him for many years.

Unfortunately, this improvement is cut short by circumstance. Frodo and Sam are captured by forces of the human kingdom of Gondor, who believe them to be spies for Sauron. Gollum is not captured, but was seen by Faramir (David Wenham), the leader of the Gondorians. When Faramir asks Frodo what happened to the "creature" he saw with them, Frodo lies in an attempt to protect Gollum's life and says that there was no creature. Later, Faramir's forces surround Gollum and Faramir threatens to kill him. Frodo intervenes and goes to Gollum to try to calm him. When Gollum is calmed down, the Gondorians attack, capturing him. Gollum sees this as a betrayal from someone he trusted and his path toward redemption is reversed. Later he schemes to kill Frodo and Sam again.

This is one of the best opportunities in the movie for discussion. What, if anything, could Frodo have done different? At each point he made the decision that he thought was in the best interests of Gollum. He also demonstrated great compassion. But in the end things were as bad as ever. The 3rd storyline follows Aragorn, Legolas, and Gimli, first as they track Merry and Pippin, then, after they lose track of them but find Gandalf, as they become deeply embroiled in the defense of the kingdom of Rohan from the armies of Saruman. There are several occurrences of note here. There is great bravery demonstrated in the face of seemingly impossible odds. There is a willingness to help others, even at great cost to one's self. There are also scenes of the most extreme violence I've seen in a movie since the beginning of "Saving Private Ryan". In the end, cooperation among the various "good" groups prove enough to successfully defend the Rohan fortress.

There are several other scenes in this movie that require particular thought by viewers. There is an apparent exorcism (by Gandalf, driving out the influence of Saruman on King Theoden (Bernard Hill)). And of course there is the question of Gandalf's resurrection.

Perhaps the most significant question raised by The Two Towers (and, indeed, by any fantasy movie or book) is how to regard it in relation to the real world. Taking as an example, the resurrection of Gandalf. After his resurrection Gandalf states that he was sent back because his work in Middle Earth was incomplete. One context in which it can be viewed is as compares to the Bible. When taken that way it bears enough resemblance to seem potentially a mockery, or at least an imitation of, the resurrection of Jesus. When taken in the context of the movie alone, or of the book, it is seen as a seemingly miraculous and almost completely unexplained event. When taken in the context of the rest of the mythology Tolkien created, which most of the movie audience will not have read, it is seen as divine event in which an angel-like being (Gandalf) is re-embodied to continue his good works.

Which is the most appropriate way to view these kinds of plot points is probably the most difficult question raised by this movie and I will not attempt to answer it here. Suffice to say, The Two Towers is not a fluff movie. It is complicated and raises questions that require careful consideration.


ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo


SCRIPTURAL APPLICATION(S)
If needed to focus or fortify, applicable text is underlined or bracketed [ ]. If you wish to have full context available, the Blue Letter Bible is a convenient source. If you use the Blue Letter Bible, a new window will open. Close it to return here or use "Window" in your browser's menu bar to alternate between the CAP page and the Blue Letter Bible page.

  • Matt. 17:1 - 2 After six days Jesus took with him Peter, James and John the brother of James, and led them up a high mountain by themselves. There he was transfigured before them. His face shone like the sun, and his clothes became as white as the light
    **"Nakedness" (display of nudity) is spoken of as dark, restricted, undesirable, shameful, etc. 47 times in the KJV from Genesis to Revelation. For example, Ezek. 16:36 "Thus saith the Lord GOD; Because thy filthiness was poured out, and thy nakedness discovered through thy whoredoms with thy lovers,..." thus associating wanton nakedness with ill repute. What makes display of nudity okay in entertainment/art if it is not okay in flesh?

    ***Selected Scriptures of Armour against the influence of the entertainment industry***
  • Ps. 12:8 The wicked freely strut about [e.g., create progressively vile/offensive entertainment with impunity and no consequences to younger and younger audiences every year] when what is vile is honored among men [when enough people continue to defend it, embrace it, pay for it, enjoy it, want it]. [I call attention to Ps. 12:8 to warn of the creeping desensitizing power of "entertainment."]
  • 1 Cor. 15:33 (KJV) Be not deceived: evil communications corrupt good manners. (NIV) Do not be misled: Bad company corrupts good character.
  • Jude 4 For certain men* whose condemnation was written about long ago have secretly slipped in among you. They are godless men, who change [warp, distort, falsely represent] the grace of our God into a license for immorality and deny Jesus Christ our only Sovereign and Lord. [*men: anthropos {anth'-ro-pos}, generic, a human being, whether male or female]
  • Matt. 25:40 And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto [or for] one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto [or for] me.
  • Luke 17:2 It would be better for him to be thrown into the sea with a millstone tied around his neck than for him to cause one of these little ones to sin. [cause by teaching or example]
  • Ps. 119:133 Direct my footsteps according to your word; let no sin rule over me.
  • John 14:15 If ye love me, keep my commandments.
  • 1 Thess. 5:22 Abstain from all appearance of evil.


    ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo


    As always, it is best to refer to the Findings/Scoring section -- the heart of the CAP analysis model -- for the most complete assessment possible of this movie.
  • FINDINGS / SCORING:


    Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (2002) CAP Thermometers



    Wanton Violence/Crime (W):
  • evil beast attack
  • great falls
  • action violence, repeatedly
  • violent battle with incendiary beast
  • battle with demon-like creatures
  • invasive imagery of demon-like evil, grotesque beasts, repeatedly
  • graphic injuries and deaths, repeatedly
  • hideous gruesome demon-like faces, repeatedly
  • graphic battles with the demon-like evil, grotesque beasts (Orcs), repeatedly
  • many graphic deaths
  • sword/spear threats, repeatedly
  • Orc's head on a pole
  • "un"dead bodies underwater
  • many arrow deaths and other impalement deaths
  • great battle with demon dogs
  • human tossed by demon dog like a rag doll
  • many attacks by demon dogs
  • eating raw flesh
  • long and graphic battle sequences, repeatedly
  • bodies flying through the air
  • bodies being scattered by great stones tossed
  • exceptionally graphic death
  • hundreds of dead bodies strewn about
  • planning murder

    Impudence/Hate (I)(1):
  • brutality, repeatedly
  • lies, repeatedly

    Sex/Homosexuality (S):
  • multiple angles and positions of a scantily clad male humanoid
  • full side nudity, male, repeatedly
  • woman on man kissing, clothed

    Drugs/Alcohol (D):
  • smoking

    Offense to God (O)(2):
  • unholy influence on thinking
  • tale of evil control over "good"
  • sorcery to defeat beast
  • gaiaism (talking trees), repeatedly
  • psychic premonitions and possessions, repeatedly
  • "all-knowing wizard"
  • unholy apparitions
  • the "undead" terrorizing others
  • sorcery to defend
  • sorcery to do battle with evil beast
  • resurrection, mockery of the Transformation
  • casting out demon
  • miraculous reverse aging
  • creatures claiming immortality
  • crystal ball sorcery
  • foretelling future
  • demon possession

    Murder/Suicide (M)(3):
  • mass murder
  • beheading murder



  • Please help keep this free service free by making generous tax-deductible donations to the CAP ministry (TIN: 75-2607488) by visiting Network for Good to give a tax-deductible monthly gift of $5, $10 or even $25 or greater or to make generous one-time or semi-regular donations.

    WE NEED YOUR HELP!!! DONATE NOW THROUGH THE

    NO service charges!!!
    Donations to the CAP Ministry are Tax Deductible!!!

    Or feel free to send your gift(s) by check or money order in US dollars to:

    CAP Ministry, PO Box 177, Granbury, TX 76048-0177

    Thank you each for your support of this ministry. Please be in earnest prayer for funding that we may continue for many years and to keep this free service free.





    Please visit our sponsor:




    ACCEPTING PROPOSALS FOR ADDITIONAL SPONSORS AND SEEKING VOLUNTEERS TO HELP LOCATE 501(C)(3) FUNDING!






    And please visit also these reciprocal links.












    Comments?

    Christian Media News

    A Singles
    Christian Network



     Click Here for a Quality Christian Site











    NOTE: The CAP Analysis Model makes no scoring allowances for trumped-up "messages" to excuse or for manufacturing of justification for aberrant behavior or imagery, or for camouflaging such ignominy with "redeeming" programming. Disguising sinful behavior in a theme plot does not excuse the sinful behavior of either the one who is drawing pleasure or example from the sinful display or the practitioners demonstrating the sinful behavior. This is NOT a movie review service. It is a movie analysis service to parents and grandparents to tell them the truth about movies using the Truth.


    "There are some in the entertainment industry who maintain that 1) violent programming is harmless because no studies exist that prove a connection between violent entertainment and aggressive behavior in children, and 2) young people know that television, movies, and video games are simply fantasy. Unfortunately, they are wrong on both accounts." And "Viewing violence may lead to real life violence." I applaud these associations for fortifying 1 Cor. 15:33. Read the rest of the story. From our nearly seven years of study, I contend that other aberrant behaviors, attitudes, and expressions can be inserted in place of "violence" in that statement. Our Director - Child Psychology Support, a licensed psychologist and certified school psychologist concurs. For example, "Viewing arrogance against fair authority may lead to your kids defying you in real life." Or "Viewing sex may lead to sex in real life." Likewise and especially with impudence, hate and foul language. I further contend that any positive behavior can be inserted in place of "violence" with the same chance or likelihood of being a behavior template for the observer; of being incorporated into the behavior mechanics and/or coping skills of the observer. In choosing your entertainment, please consider carefully the "rest of the story" and our findings.





    Join Christian Banner Exchange Network Today!








    (1) As noted in CAP Special Report-001, "Investigation Area and Scoring Trend," of the six CAP Investigation Areas, Impudence/Hate was the strongest presence in all four movie classifications. It has a strong revelation about the entertainment media.

    (2) The use of the three/four letter word vocabulary without God's name in vain is incorporated into the Impudence/Hate Investigation Area. The use of God's name with or without the four letter expletive is incorporated into the Offense to God Investigation Area. There is no duplication.

    (3) Only portrayal of successful murder or suicide are incorporated into Murder/Suicide. Portrayal of attempts to commit murder or suicide and deaths by police action or war are incorporated into Wanton Violence/Crime.





    The ChildCare Action Project (CAP) is a nonprofit Christian ministry. We rely on public support. If you wish to contribute to the CAP, please send your donations to

    ChildCare Action Project
    Post Office Box 177
    Granbury, TX 76048-0177

    Your gifts are tax deductible in accordance with Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Service Tax Codes.

    Please feel free to write to us.





    You are welcome to go to the

    CAP Reports page

    or go to the

    Top of the CAP Home Page
    or the
    CAP Site Map (Table of Contents)





    Thank you for visiting us and may God bless you. Prayerfully, we will provide you with some of the most revealing commentary and investigative reporting you have ever read.

    In the name of Jesus:
    Lord, Master, Teacher, Savior, God.

    ChildCare Action Project (CAP): Christian Analysis of American Culture

    Copyright ChildCare Action Project (CAP) Ministry




    Since Deember 5, 2000