RED does not mean "stop." GREEN does not mean "go." Click on the CAPCon Alert image for explanation |
Reel World Reality A ministry of the ChildCare Action Project: Christian Analysis of American Culture (CAP Ministry) A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit Christian Ministry. www.capalert.com/ Entertainment Media Analysis Report A service to His little ones through you in His name by His Word MAR2012.003 (2010), NR [R-NR*] (72.1min) The #1 Christian entertainment media analysis service on the Internet. We give you OBJECTIVE tools NO ONE ELSE CAN to help YOU make an informed decision for yourself whether a film is fit for your family. Over 1300 analyses for parents, grandparents, pastors, youth leaders and more. |
(a PayPal account is NOT required). The CAP is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit Christian ministry. Donations are TAX-DEDUCTIBLE. |
on what Hollywood feeds your kids. SUBSCRIBE (or unsubscribe) to our FREE email version of these reports and our COMING SOON notices. |
Christian Long Distance |
(While the Scriptural references are certainly not subjective, my commentary may be and sometimes is somewhat subjective.)
Production (US): Phase 4 Films, Tin Roof Films, ECG Productions Distribution (US): Phase 4 Films Director(s): Jason Winn Producer(s): J. Todd Smith, Jason Sirotin, Jackson Giles, Larry Lorestani, Michael Buchanan, Diane Lang, Jason Winn, Ron Lester Adapted from the novel The Fat Boy Chronicles by Michael Buchanan and Diane Lang Screenplay by: Michael Buchanan, Diane Lang Cinematography/Camera: Jeffery Osbern Music: Kim Burdges, Joe Kraemer Film Editing: Jason Marrassini Casting: Dianne Sleek Production Design: Celeste Dye Viewed on Phase 4 Films DVD Inspired by a true story Fourteen year old Jimmy Winterpock (Christopher Rivera) is overweight. He eats when he is happy. He eats when he is sad. He eats when he is bored. He is 5'5" and is 188 pounds. Almost everyone at the Newman High School is on his case about being the fat kid at school. Some kids chide him for having a bigger chest than the girls at school. Self esteem is fragile and can be bought or manufactured, for example, by wearing trendy clothes or being given a passing grade for simply showing up for class every day. Self respect has to be built such as by working hard to earn a passing grade and is inherently much stronger and real. But all too often, self esteem becomes a governor or regulator against building one's self respect: sometimes self respect becomes a puppet of self esteem. Since Jimmy's self esteem is wrecked his self respect suffers. He falls servant to self denigration often. On the DVD cover Anna Arnold, President of the International Bullying Prevention Association says "This film will help empower our youth to engage in peaceful, respectful relationships, free of bullying." On the flip side of that coin, some of the content portrayed in the film may embolden youth into aggression. Also on the DVD cover Dr. John Barge, Superintendent of Schools State of Georgia says it is "a must see for every parent and educator." Emboldenment into aggression by example is no respecter of age. Youth may be more vulnerable or prone to emboldenment into aggression than adults but adults, too, suffer the same influence, whether acted on or not. [Prov. 16:29] Many kids who watch such material as The Fat Boy Chronicles experience selective content capture and do not grasp the big picture positive intent of such content but instead pick-n-choose and focus on the micro-parts that most closely and sympathetically touch events and conditions in their personal lives. Many youth may reject or simply not capture much of the positive content that is intended to be communicated in favor of the parts which pry open their own social warfare scars or feed their own desires. Consider, for example the following taken from our analysis of Unbreakable: A 13 year old boy aimed a gun he loaded and cocked at his father. The boy's intent was to prove his father was a super hero who could not die. Remember what God has told us in 1 Cor. 15:33 "Do not be misled: Bad company corrupts good character." The "bad company" imagery in that scene may be captured by youth as power to defy by holding dad ("unfair control") hostage rather than what the scene is supposed to be saying, not to mention being captured as the lowering of inhibitions of the viewer against using a firearm as a power tool; power which all adolescents crave. There may be many emotional and social filters and barriers in the observer in the path of such imagery on its way to the brain that by the time the imagery gets to the brain all that remains of the original imagery is a picture of the power in holding dad hostage ... with a gun. Kids may be attitudinally fed by the "bad company" content because they do not yet have the experiential maturity to prevent selectivity of content which feeds doing the wrong thing, rejecting the wisdom of the positive big picture intent in favor of the micro-gratification provided by the "bad company" content. It is wise of Dr. Barge to say "every parent and educator" and not include teens in that domain. Anna Arnold apparently does not possess such wisdom. This film is not fit for teens. It is R-equivalent. Not so much because of the intensity of individual examples of assault on morality and decency which is typically the case for R-rated films but rather due to so many assaults of the "lesser" kind crammed into a relatively short time -- a heavy influence density (see our CAP Rule of 1000 publication for more information). The final score of 37 out of 100 is strong evidence of this when R-rated films in the comparative baseline database of films earned final scores of 54 and below. The scale to the left demonstrates the "R-ness" of this film. The final score of 37 shown by the star falls deeply in the domain of final scores earned by R-rated films in the comparative baseline database -- 54 and below out of 100. To further fortify what I have just told you is a finding we have made regarding the influence of the content of entertainment. Let me discuss for a moment that it is not so much violence, sex and drugs/alcohol in and as entertainment that conjure aberrant behavioral choices in youth. These properties of entertainment do indeed take their toll on the behavioral mechanics of the viewer, especially of the youthful viewer, but it is the attitude displayed during the portrayal of aberrant behavior that does the most damage to wholesome moral standards. This film is full of attitude. Bad attitude. It is unwise to try to fight bullying with demonstrating it. That it is entertainment does not absolve the demonstrations of undesirable influence, even if there is "redemption" in the end. A noble destination does not excuse an ignoble path. While the lead performer sitting in a church, a couple mentions of church and a mention of a picture of Jesus covering a crack in the wall in a song are certainly not corruptive features of the story, it takes more than that to make a film a Christian film. "Christian" means "CHRISTian," not "religious." There is no mention of Christ as our Lord and Savior by whose Blood Sacrifice we are given a path to Salvation. There is no mention of the Gospel in this film. One of the "lesser" ways this film presents potentially corruptive content is one scene of Jimmy kissing Sable in the high school cafeteria ... more than once. The filmmakers had Jimmy's father saying "that's my boy" while exhibiting an air of pride. There is dissonance in that cinematic equation. Public display of affection (PDA) is against the rules of school attendance. Making humor of such defiance in and as entertainment does not evaporate the reason for such a rule or the benefits of it. So, in this instance the film promotes disregarding of the rules in favor of personal gratification. Such is true for far too many examples of behavior and thus belittle and even demonize noble and proper adherence to them. Following are brief discussions of the content per individual content investigation area. As always the Findings section of this report, the heart of the CAP Analysis Model, is the best source for discovering the full accounting of the content of this film. Wanton Violence/Crime (W) - Zero out of 100 The largest contribution of assaults on morality and decency in this film are the portrayals of bullying, tormenting and intimidating by fear. These features of acidic behavior are frequent. Additional material applicable to this content investigation area includes a slap to the face, physical assault, inflicting self injuries, a report of murder of a teen girl and a teen runaway. There are no specific portrayals of extreme violence or crime, e.g., no guts or gore and no stabbings or gunfire, etc., but there are so many portrayals of "lesser" matters of the violent nature that the total envelope or the magnitude of them equal the magnitude of the violence content in many R-rated films. Visit our CAP Rule of 1000 for more information about this technique of loading the content of entertainment. While an ill-informed specific interest group is desperately pushing the abolition of bullying violence in schools, God warned of its danger hundreds of years ago in many verses throughout the Old Testament and the New Testament. While more than 50 verses speak darkly of practicing violence, Proverb 16:29 is one I choose to use to impart His Word to you. In Proverb 16:29 God warns that violence is "catching": that violence can lead one into the path that is not good. Since God "published His finding" regarding violence, man has done the same by plagiarizing His word by four professional public health agencies publishing that viewing violence in and as entertainment can, among other things, lead the viewer, especially the youthful viewer, to real life violence and can cause the viewer to believe violence is an acceptable way to settle conflict. Impudence/Hate (I) - Zero out of 100 Akin to the violence of bullying, tormenting and intimidation by fear is the hatred behind social cruelty, the self denigration and a father's hatred of his son (and vice versa) portrayed in this film. In addition, there is lying, cheating, tales of misery at the hands of abusive parents and adolescents saying they hate their parents. [Rom. 12:8] A few crude expressions and one euphemism of the mot foul of the foul words color the script. [Eph. 4:29] Sexual Immorality (S) - 45 out of 100 There is no nudity in this film nor does anyone get in bed with any one else. However, there is more to sexual immorality than those boldly obvious behaviors. Teen boys talk of the gender-specific parts of girls rather often. One lad has pinups on his bedroom wall. Teens are seen in underwear and one is seen in the shower. But the boldest portrayal of sexually immoral behavior is when a teen girl lifts her sweater to expose herself to prove her chest is bigger than Jimmy's. Though the girl is wearing underwear, it does not excuse the behavior. And note that acting does not excuse sexually immoral behavior. [1 Thess. 4:7] Drugs/Alcohol (D) - 17 out of 100 There is alcoholic beverage in this film. And drinking of it. And drunkenness with it. By teens. And there is smoking. Also by a teen. Whatever the reason for such display in and as entertainment, it brings danger to the youthful observer. So sayeth the American College of Physicians (ACP). A 2002 study by the American College of Physicians (ACP) revealed that adolescent exposure to drinking in and as entertainment undeniably leads to abuse of alcohol among underage viewers. The finding entitled Relation Between Parental Restrictions on Movies and Adolescent Use of Tobacco and Alcohol reports that of 4544 youths from grades 5 through 8 of fifteen Vermont and New Hampshire middle schools (90% of the youths were under fourteen years old) only 16% were completely restricted in their entertainment diets. Within the ACP study population, the prevalence of having tried alcohol without parental knowledge was There is nothing to say that viewing smoking in and as entertainment does not carry the same danger of influence as viewing drinking. Actually, the same matter of behavior implantation applies to any behavior demonstrated in and as entertainment, including good behavior. Offense to God (O) - 72 out of 100 God's name is abused four times, three of them by teens. Any use of God's name other than with respect, reverence or in responsible discussion and in praise and prayer is in vain. That includes the teen-popular three syllable sentence with His name trailing it. God will not hold guiltless anyone who abuses His name. Whether we believe it or not. Whether we like it or not. Whether we care or not. [Deut. 5:11] Murder/Suicide (M) - 95 out of 100 There are no murders in this film. There is, however, one suicide. That of a father. Though the actual suicide is not seen it is an integral element of the package communicated and leads to subsequent behavior aberrations. SCRIPTURAL APPLICATION(S) If needed to focus or fortify, applicable text is underlined or bracketed [ ] or bold. If you wish to have full context available, the Blue Letter Bible is a convenient source. If you use the Blue Letter Bible, a new window will open. Close it to return here or use "Window" in your browser's menu bar to alternate between the CAP page and the Blue Letter Bible page. CHAPTER/VERSE --> Children who see a lot of violence are more likely to view violence as an effective way of settling conflicts. Children exposed to violence are more likely to assume the acts of violence are acceptable behavior. --> Viewing violence can lead to emotional desensitization towards violence in real life. It can decease the likelihood that one will take action on behalf of a victim when violence occurs. --> Entertainment violence feeds a perception that the world is a violent and mean place. Viewing violence increases fear of becoming a victim of violence, with a resultant increase in self-protective behavior and a mistrust of others. --> Viewing violence may lead to real life violence. Children exposed to violent programming at a young age have a higher tendency for violent and aggressive behavior later in life than children who are not so exposed. Further, God speaks darkly of violence 56 times in the Old and New Testament of the KJV.] As always, it is best to refer to the Findings/Scoring section -- the heart of the CAP analysis model -- for the most complete assessment possible of this movie. |
(The objective heart of the CAP Analysis Model, independent of and insulated from the Summary / Commentary section.) Wanton Violence/Crime (W) - Zero out of 100 Impudence/Hate (I) - Zero out of 100 Sexual Immorality (S) - 45 out of 100 LIST Drugs/Alcohol (D) - 17 out of 100 Offense to God (O) - 65 out of 100 Murder/Suicide (M) - 95 out of 100 |
There are some in the entertainment industry who maintain that 1) violent programming is harmless because no studies exist that prove a connection between violent entertainment and aggressive behavior in children, and 2) young people know that television, movies, and video games are simply fantasy. Unfortunately, they are wrong on both accounts." And "Viewing violence may lead to real life violence." I applaud these associations for fortifying 1 Cor. 15:33. Read the rest of the story. From our years of study, I contend that other aberrant behaviors, attitudes, and expressions can be inserted in place of "violence" in that statement. Our Director - Child Psychology Support, a licensed psychologist and certified school psychologist concurs. For example, "Viewing arrogance against fair authority may lead to your kids defying you in real life." Or "Viewing sex may lead to sex in real life." Likewise and especially with impudence, hate and foul language. I further contend that any positive behavior can be inserted in place of "violence" with the same chance or likelihood of being a behavior template for the observer; of being incorporated into the behavior mechanics and/or coping skills of the observer. In choosing your entertainment, please consider carefully the "rest of the story" and our findings. |
Thank you for visiting us and may God bless you. Prayerfully, we will provide you with some of the most revealing commentary and investigative reporting you have ever read. In the name of Jesus: Lord, Master, Teacher, Savior, God. Tom Carder Chaplain and President ChildCare Action Project (CAP): Christian Analysis of American Culture 100% dependent on your tax-deductible financial support |
Christian Long Distance |
|
We exist only by your tax-deductible donations. PLEASE Features PayPal! You do NOT need an account to donate. |
For G rated Films with G equivalence: G PG equivalence: PG-G PG-13 equivalence: 13-G R equivalence: R-G< | For PG rated Films with G equivalence: G-PG PG equivalence: PG PG-13 equivalence: 13-PG R equivalence: R-PG | For PG-13 rated Films with G equivalence: G-13 PG equivalence: PG(13) PG-13 equivalence: PG-13 R equivalence: R-13 | For R rated Films with G equivalence: G-R PG equivalence: PG-R PG-13 equivalence: 13-R R equivalence: R | For NR rated Films with G equivalence: G-NR PG equivalence: PG-NR PG-13 equivalence: 13-NR R equivalence: R-NR |