Click on CAPCon Alert image for explanation
Christian Analysis of American Culture (CAP Ministry)
Entertainment Media Analysis Report
A service to His little ones (which includes at-home teens) through you, their parents and grandparents, in His name by His Word
Give your visitors access to more than 800 CAP movie analyses while your page stays open. Put the link above on your web page. FREE! Test it! Click it!
Make your tax-deductible donations to the CAP Ministry through
Click here to see
UPDATED December 31, 2003
|US MAIL in US Dollars to
PO Box 177
Granbury, TX 76048-0177
Preferred. NO Service Charges.
|If either of the above two links have not worked properly for you, please try again. THANK YOU!!!|
To subscribe to or unsubscribe from our FREE text-only versions of our Entertainment Media Analysis Reports as they are calculated, visit our Mailman. If you experience difficulty with Mailman, send us your request. Your email address will NOT be given or sold to other parties.
|ALERT: To fully understand this report you should first visit the topics suggested by the CAP Site Map (Table of Contents). Further, if you do not want the plot, ending, or "secrets" of a movie spoiled for you, skip the Summary/Commentary. In any case, be sure to visit the Findings/Scoring section -- it is completely objective to His Word and is the heart of the CAP Entertainment Media Analysis Model applied to this movie.|
(2004), PG-13 (a.k.a RISK, 2002) -- A good plot and theme so far for a movie for 13 year olds, dontchaknow.
Cast/Crew Details Courtesy Internet Movie Database
Production (US): Jersey Films, Loofah Productions
Distribution (US): Universal Pictures
Director(s): John Hamburg
Producer(s): Anders Bard, Jane Bartelme, Danny DeVito, Daniel S. Levine, Michael Shamberg, Stacey Sher
Written by: John Hamburg
Cinematography/Camera: Seamus McGarvey
Music: Theodore Shapiro
Film Editing: William Kerr, Nick Moore
Casting: Kathleen Chopin
Production Design: Andrew Laws
Art Direction: Martin Whist
Viewed At: Driftwood Theater 6
The year 2004 is starting out with no indication of any reduction in the percentage of PG-13 movies that earn scores earned by R-rated movies (R-13 movies
* NOTE: We have calculated the percentage of PG-13 movies which earn R-13 scores since 1997 but we cannot do so for 2003. We have all the massive data but until we find adequate funding to compile it and prepare it for publication, the R-13 figure for 2003 will remain locked away in the data.
Ruben Feffer (Ben Stiller) was an expert risk analyst for a major New York insurance company. His job was to determine whether clients were good risks or bad risks. Ruben dealt with facts. Facts such as there is a one in 46,000 chance that someone would fall through a subway drain and that only 1 in 6 people wash their hands after using the restroom. Ruben had some risk assessment software that generated risk figures about the lifestyles of clients. Clients such as Leland Van Lew (Bryan Brown) who was a risk-taking CEO, risk-taking such as base jumping - parachuting off tall buildings - who needed an insurance recommendation from Ruben else he was uninsurable.
The story opens with Ruben getting married to Lisa Kramer (Debra Messing). Soon the pair were seen on their honeymoon. As Ruben and Lisa sunbathed and contemplated their new marriage and life together, local scuba instructor Claude (Hank Azaria) tried to snag their business - nude. And, yes, your 13 year olds will see Azaria nude from the rear. Fully nude. Head to toe nude. And they will see Messing glance occasionally at Azaria's ... nudity ... frontal nudity. Ruben decided scuba diving was not for him but, trusting his new wife, encouraged her to go for it. And go for it she did. Lisa was so enthralled by Claude's - er - imagery that she ended up "messing" around with Clause on his yacht. With a good excuse, of course. It just happened. Something you don't plan, y'know. [Prov. 12:4] Figuring if Kramer could do it once she would do it again, the marriage was over and Ruben returned to his work in New York. A good plot and theme so far for a movie for 13 year olds, dontchaknow.
Once back in New York, after everybody who knew him already knew about his wife's adultery on his honeymoon and after everybody tried to console him, his best friend Sandy Lyle (Philip Seymour Hoffman), actor wannabe, convinced Ruben he needed to circulate and find somebody with which to have [sexual] fun in his time of depression [Gal. 5:19]. At a party at the Latin Quarter underground dance club, along came Polly. Polly Prince (Jennifer Aniston), an acquaintance from school. After finding some social compatibility, Ruben and Polly hit is off, rocky to be sure, but it was at least a relationship. An immoral relationship. Which brings me to end another short Summary/Commentary to save costs and to that which most of you come to our pages.
Azaria's nudity is not the only nudity in the show. Full male nudity is repeated several times plus some side male nudity. Female nudity is limited to side nudity. And there is intercourse in this PG-13 flick. Mostly covered but intercourse nonetheless. One episode of intercourse is thrown at you from several angles repeatedly. Let me pause and look back at the last six sentences. Nudity ... nudity .... nudity ... nudity ... nudity ... nudity ... intercourse ... intercourse ... intercourse. [**; 1Ths. 4:3 - 7] Does that say anything to you about this PG-13 film? And that is not all.
There are 25 uses of the three/four letter word vocabulary [Eph. 5:4], five uses of God's name in vain with the four letter expletive and 21 without [Deut. 5:11]. Flatulence enough to shame a group f elementary school locker room boys. Rub dancing, drinking, "therapy" in stabbing pillows, sex talk/innuendo, inappropriate touch. below navel skin threatening to expose that which anatomically follows and more.
And yes, there is "gay" presence in this PG-13 film. A Salsa dance partner of Polly's seemed to develop a sexual interest in Polly (now on the verge of being Ruben's girlfriend though Ruben is still married to Lisa). Polly seemed to reciprocate. When Ruben confronted the Salsa dude he admitted proudly of choosing to practice homosexuality. And, as usual, there is no mention of any of the other side of the story of practicing homosexuality. [1Cor. 6:9-10]
If you let your kids watch this film, don't be surprised if they start using terms like "sharting" and "sharted."
If needed to focus or fortify, applicable text is underlined or bracketed [ ]. If you wish to have full context available, the Blue Letter Bible is a convenient source. If you use the Blue Letter Bible, a new window will open. Close it to return here or use "Window" in your browser's menu bar to alternate between the CAP page and the Blue Letter Bible page.
***Selected Scriptures of Armour against the influence of the entertainment industry***
As always, it is best to refer to the Findings/Scoring section -- the heart of the CAP analysis model -- for the most complete assessment possible of this movie.
Wanton Violence/Crime (W)
Sexual Immorality (S)
Offense to God (O)
Single Christian Network
Kids, Teens and Home Vertical Portal
|There are some in the entertainment industry who maintain that 1) violent programming is harmless because no studies exist that prove a connection between violent entertainment and aggressive behavior in children, and 2) young people know that television, movies, and video games are simply fantasy. Unfortunately, they are wrong on both accounts." And "Viewing violence may lead to real life violence." I applaud these associations for fortifying 1 Cor. 15:33. Read the rest of the story. From our more than eight years of study, I contend that other aberrant behaviors, attitudes, and expressions can be inserted in place of "violence" in that statement. Our Director - Child Psychology Support, a licensed psychologist and certified school psychologist concurs. For example, "Viewing arrogance against fair authority may lead to your kids defying you in real life." Or "Viewing sex may lead to sex in real life." Likewise and especially with impudence, hate and foul language. I further contend that any positive behavior can be inserted in place of "violence" with the same chance or likelihood of being a behavior template for the observer; of being incorporated into the behavior mechanics and/or coping skills of the observer. In choosing your entertainment, please consider carefully the "rest of the story" and our findings.|