RED does not mean "stop." GREEN does not mean "go." Click on the CAPCon Alert image for explanation |
A ministry of the ChildCare Action Project: Christian Analysis of American Culture (CAP Ministry) A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit Christian Ministry. www.capalert.com/ Entertainment Media Analysis Report A service to His little ones through you in His name by His Word MAR29021 (2009), PG-13 [Hard R-13*] (1hr 45min) The #1 Christian entertainment media analysis service on the Internet. We give you OBJECTIVE tools NO ONE ELSE CAN to help YOU make an informed decision for yourself whether a film is fit for your family. Over 1200 analyses for parents, grandparents, pastors, youth leaders and more. |
(a PayPal account is NOT required) OR (preferred) by Check or Money Order. The CAP is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit Christian ministry. Donations to us are TAX-DEDUCTIBLE |
on what Hollywood feeds your kids. SUBSCRIBE (or unsubscribe) to our FREE text-only email version of these reports and our COMING SOON notices. |
Christian Long Distance |
(While the Scriptural references are certainly not subjective, my commentary may be and sometimes is somewhat subjective.)
Cast/Crew Details Courtesy Internet Movie Database Production (US): The Mark Gordon Company, Midnight Sun Pictures, WWE Films Distribution (US): 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment Director(s): Renny Harlin Producer(s): Becki Cross Trujillo, Mark Gordon, Renny Harlin, Mike Lake, Josh McLaughlin, Vince McMahon Written by: Daniel Kunka Cinematography/Camera: David Boyd Music: Trevor Rabin Film Editing: Brian Berdan Casting: John Papsidera Production Design: Nicholas Lundy Viewed on 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment DVD This analysis is sponsored by the generosity of E&HP. The MPAA says 12 Rounds is "PG-13 for intense sequences of violence and action" but it is about as "R" as "R" can get. 12 Rounds earned a PG-equivalent score in Drugs/Alcohol (D) content but R-equivalent scores in all of the five other investigation areas (W, I, S, O, M). "PG-13 for intense sequences of violence and action" says nothing about the 41 uses of profanity, the abuse of God's name with and without the four letter expletive, the cohabitation, the sexual innuendo, the inappropriate touch, the video of intercourse ... How else can I put it? 12 Rounds should have been rated R. If not R then NC-17. But then I do not and will not have analysis data of any NC-17 films so I cannot say 12 Rounds should have been rated NC-17. But I do have a l-o-t of data that say this film is truly equivalent to most R-rated films. Even its Influence Density (ID) score corroborates the R-equivalent final score of 31 out of 100. R-rated films typically earn Influence Density scores from 0.78 to 2.04 (the higher score the more severe). 12 Rounds earned an Influence Density score of 2.13. Too bad, too. 12 Rounds has a good story line and can be quite engrossing. The hand-held camera technique and the attention to detail add to the power of the story. 12 Rounds is deceiving in its face. I found myself thinking "I just might be able let my older kids watch this with me since, having seen it, I can jump past the sexual content and since the Curse-Free TV filter will delete the 41 uses of profanity and the eight uses of God's name in vain." But once I saw the resulting numbers the decision was made for me ... instantly. At the risk of sounding a braggart, the comeuppance the CAP Analysis Model gave me is testimony to the efficiency and objectivity of it. Too bad also that the MPAA would label this piece of hard R as approved for our youth by slapping a PG-13 on it. No wonder our youth culture is getting what seems to be so insensitive, dark, arrogant and bitter. I'm telling you, folks, that of all the non-Faith influences in a child's life the only exofamilial entity that more deeply and intimately saturates our children than the entertainment industry is air: that all the influences in a child's life which lead him/her to question and even abandon your home-taught Bible-based ethics and morality cower before the immensity of the indelible influence of entertainment. Not one other influence in the world has as far-reaching and deep-soaking effect as entertainment ... universally. And probably every movie lover teen and older preteen will deny movies have any effect on their values, personal integrity and coping skills. But not only do the American Medical Association, the American Psychological Association and others disagree, so does God disagree. [1 Cor. 15:33] Take for example text books. Textbooks have wide-spread influence, right? Every school-attending child in the country has some interface with a textbook of some sort. Maybe textbooks do have wide-spread influence but texts used in a school in Maine are not likely the same as the texts used in California or Oregon or Florida. Home life? Home life is typically a function of the degree of friction created within the home which is undeniably fueled by the freedom from accountability, the freedom from authority and the freedom from consequences taught by nearly every film targeted at teens and preteens. And the influence of a film in Florida is identical to the influence of that same film in Washington, in Montana and every other place where the film is shown. That is why I say "universally." And since I and my wife have provided 24-7 care for 39 kids over a period of nearly 20 years I suspect what I said above is credible. On the surface even I, the "engineer" of the CAP Analysis Model, felt 12 Rounds j-u-s-t might be on the borderline of tolerable for my older kids. But I was wrong. And the CAP Analysis Model was what proved me wrong. Thank you, Jesus. While I might be the engineer of the analysis model, Jesus is the Designer. Thanks go to Him. He has warned us over and over that evil will be very attractive and alluring and seductive and ... Even I, for a short while, became "trapped" in its snare to the extent of almost believing this film, after editing out the profanity and sexual matters, could be "safely" viewed by my older kids with me. Preachers are not immune. Enough of the sermon ... err ... blog. Whatever. On to the story. After a series of attempts of the FBI under the lead of Special Agents George Aiken (Steve Harris) and Ray Santiago (Gonzalo Menendez) to track and capture international arms dealer, murderer and espionage master, Miles Jackson (Aiden Gillen), we are introduced to New Orleans police officer Danny Fisher (John Cena) and his two-week live-in girlfriend Molly Porter (Ashley Scott) in her home ... and in her underwear. After a number of innuendo of sexually focused behaviors embedded in imitation bliss and blunder of daily married routine, Fisher leaves for "work" with his partner, Hank Carver (Brian J. White) who has been patiently waiting for Fisher while Fisher looks for his badge. Fisher and Carver, through a series of chance events and through Fisher's keen instinct for police work, found and arrested Jackson. During the initial efforts to arrest Jackson, Carver is shot in his behind and is left behind by Fisher to pursue Jackson who fled capture with his cohort and love-of-his-life girlfriend, Erica Kessen (Taylor Cole) in tow. During the ensuing arrest Jackson told Erica to run from the arrest and that is what she did ... right into the path of an SUV. Jackson blamed Fisher for Erica's death. Jackson told Fisher "I'll remember you!" Now there is an example of trying to make the criminal the victim. Jackson told Erica to run and she chose to do so. The "reality" of it is if she didn't run she would still be alive and unhurt. But of course, in Jackson's mind neither he nor she had any accountability for her choice to run and her resulting death. Fisher and Carver are promoted to Detective for capturing Jackson. One year later Jackson escapes prison and launches a plan to get even, even if it kills Fisher. Jackson still blames Fisher for Erica's death. Jackson's false blame of Fisher has festered for a year. During that year Jackson hatched an intricate plan to use Molly to lead Fisher to his death. Jackson's plan is so intricate Jackson calls it a game. The game begins with the blowing up of Molly's house, hopefully to kill Fisher. But Fisher was outside of the house when the bomb exploded. But Phil the plumber (Kim Collins) was not outside. That was Round One which Fisher won. Now comes Round Two then round Three ... on to Round 12. The challenge for Fisher is to stay alive and keep Molly alive for the 12 Rounds. Some of the most detailed crime creativity I've seen was portrayed in this tentatively balanced but somewhat powerful tale of police action. Unfortunately, some of the worst levels of violence and profanity were part of the story. As always, the best accounting of the total content is provided in the itemized listings in the Findings/Scoring section -- the heart of the CAP Analysis Model -- but the individual investigation area discussions below (for those who don't like lists) will present some the findings made by the CAP Analysis Model. Wanton Violence/Crime (W) - Zero out of 100 With some form of violence (or crime) every 2.9 of the 105 minutes of this film, the density of violence is quite high. Not just because of the intensity of individual instances of violence but because of the sheer number of them as well. True to the traditional "R" rating, some of the violence is graphic and with gore (maybe "lite" gore to the MPAA) while the film includes a plethora of examples of "lesser" instances of violence. So, the content not only uses the tried-n-true technique of challenging the threshold of extreme but the relatively new technique of saturating the story with dozens of "lesser" instances of violence as well. See our CAP Rule of 1000 for more information on the technique of using "lesser" examples to load or weight the content of a film. Gunfire to kill repeatedly, including with seeing the bullet impact. Gun battles. Pedestrian versus motor vehicle gore. Dead body with gore. Abduction and bondage to coerce. Extortion with explosives using human life as leverage. Action violence of varying intensities. Graphic fighting and beating. More. This film will certainly imprint lasting impressions in most viewers resulting in desensitization to the gravity of such behavior, especially in youth. God knew what He was talking about when He warned us about embracing violence for whatever reason. [Prov. 16:29] Impudence/Hate (I) - Zero out of 100 Someone expresses impudence/arrogance by uttering some form of profanity 41 times in the 105 minutes of the film (from the first frame to the first of the rolling credits). [Col. 3:8, 2 Tim. 2:16, Lev. 26:19, Prov. 6:17] Also Jackson implements his hatred of Fisher by using Molly as a vehicle for an explosive device to extort Fisher into playing his game. [Prov. 3:31] Sexual Immorality (S) - 46 out of 100 There are a number of clearly sexually-oriented innuendo and comments in this film. There is an on screen video of Cole either having extramarital intercourse with or was lap dancing on Gillen. I couldn't tell which and don't care which. I am not going to replay it over and over again to find out. It doesn't matter which anyway. Though no nudity is visible both are sexually immoral behaviors. There is portrayal of women as sex toys and an evacuation parade of women in scant dress. Fisher and Porter live together unmarried. There is bragging of women being targets of sexual conquest. Even the end background song speaks of sexual desire. After decades of the sexual revolution what should we expect in a film approved for our early teens which, by the way, feeds sexually immoral behavior choices: which, by the way, feeds the extent of sexual freedom; which, by the way, feeds ... Does anyone but a very few know that there is now before Congress a bill to make it illegal to say anything against the chosen practice of homosexuality INCLUDING the homosexual practice of pedophilia (Ref: the North American Man-boy Love Association - NAMBLA)? And how do you suppose we got here? Alfred Kinsey, the Indiana University father of the sexual revolution helped. But how did he get the way he was? Drugs/Alcohol (D) - 84 out of 100 12 Rounds is not heavy in drinking or smoking. Smoking, noted only once, with a bar scene with booze and drinking were all that were noted applicable to this investigation area. Offense to God (O) - 46 out of 100 God's name was abused eight times in the 105 minutes of the film. Four times with the four letter expletive and four times without. Not that it matters to filmmakers but either way, with or without the four letter expletive, using His name in such ways as were used in this film are sinful. I did not write the Rules, folks. The Father of the One who spent three days in Hell so you and I would not have to spend one moment there did. [Deut. 5:11] In addition to the abuse of God's name Jackson is noted as seeking revenge strictly for the sake of getting even. God sayeth vengeance is His, not ours. [Rom. 12:19] Murder/Suicide (M) - 11 out of 100 Murder is portrayed in many forms: by report; by admission; by blade; by explosion; by free-fall; by firearm. God is very specific about the destiny of [unforgiven] murderers. [Rev. 22:15] There were, however, no suicides noted. SCRIPTURAL APPLICATION(S) If needed to focus or fortify, applicable text is underlined or bracketed [ ] or bold. If you wish to have full context available, the Blue Letter Bible is a convenient source. If you use the Blue Letter Bible, a new window will open. Close it to return here or use "Window" in your browser's menu bar to alternate between the CAP page and the Blue Letter Bible page. CHAPTER/VERSE ***Selected Scriptures of Armour against the influence of the entertainment industry*** As always, it is best to refer to the Findings/Scoring section -- the heart of the CAP analysis model -- for the most complete assessment possible of this movie. |
Wanton Violence/Crime (W) - Zero out of 100 Impudence/Hate (I) - Zero out of 100 Sexual Immorality (S) - 46 out of 100 Drugs/Alcohol (D) - 84 out of 100 Offense to God (O) - 46 out of 100 Murder/Suicide (M) - 11 out of 100 |
There are some in the entertainment industry who maintain that 1) violent programming is harmless because no studies exist that prove a connection between violent entertainment and aggressive behavior in children, and 2) young people know that television, movies, and video games are simply fantasy. Unfortunately, they are wrong on both accounts." And "Viewing violence may lead to real life violence." I applaud these associations for fortifying 1 Cor. 15:33. Read the rest of the story. From our years of study, I contend that other aberrant behaviors, attitudes, and expressions can be inserted in place of "violence" in that statement. Our Director - Child Psychology Support, a licensed psychologist and certified school psychologist concurs. For example, "Viewing arrogance against fair authority may lead to your kids defying you in real life." Or "Viewing sex may lead to sex in real life." Likewise and especially with impudence, hate and foul language. I further contend that any positive behavior can be inserted in place of "violence" with the same chance or likelihood of being a behavior template for the observer; of being incorporated into the behavior mechanics and/or coping skills of the observer. In choosing your entertainment, please consider carefully the "rest of the story" and our findings. |
Thank you for visiting us and may God bless you. Prayerfully, we will provide you with some of the most revealing commentary and investigative reporting you have ever read. In the name of Jesus: Lord, Master, Teacher, Savior, God. Tom Carder President ChildCare Action Project (CAP): Christian Analysis of American Culture 100% dependent on your tax-deductible financial support |
Christian Long Distance |
|
We exist only by your tax-deductible donations. PLEASE Features PayPal! You do NOT need an account to donate. |