2006 ADDENDUM: Mary Poppins presented nothing evil or sinister. Indeed, the character could have been portraying an angel. And she was not hailed as a witch / wizard / sorcerer(ess) nor advertised as such. Regarding the use of "magic", if Jesus had thrown Himself off the pinnacle at Satan's tease would the angels in Matt. 4:5-6, who would have lifted Him up from being dashed on the rocks, have sinned with their "magic?" Did Jesus sin as He used His "magic" to cast out demons? Heal the sick? Make the blind see and the lame walk? Raise the dead? There is a great deal of difference between Mary Poppins "magic" and Harry Potter (and Lord of the Rings, etc.) witchcraft / sorcery / wizardry. The source of the power determines the holiness OR unholiness of it, not the user nor the use of it. There was no mention or implication of witchcraft / sorcery / wizardry in Mary Poppins but Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings were not only filled with witchcraft / sorcery / wizardry but based ON them, with "magic" not from God. While Mary Poppins and Lord of the Rings both used magic for good, both Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings had the "good" using evil (witchcraft / sorcery / wizardry) to do good, thus serving evil. Angels and angel-possessed people use good "magic", better termed holy power from God. Witches, wizards, warlocks, sorcerers, etc. (people possessed of Satanic interests) use power from Satan, even if it is called "white magic." |